File Name: pros and cons of animal testing .zip
Animal testing on cosmetics is related to a lot of aspects of the manufacturing process of these products, which is performed for the individual ingredients within their formulas. Though this method brought about some good news on the improvement of beauty products, it has become one of the most controversial subjects in the world. While countries, such as the UK, have banned its practice and the European Union has introduced a testing and marketing ban, it is still occurring in other countries. Now, both sides of the argument are standing their grounds with firm and solid opinions being pushed, making it difficult for them to reach any agreement. It helps with improving human health. With this practice, we can make sure that people will never be exposed to any harmful chemicals or toxins in cosmetics, leading to a drop in consumer health risks.
Using animals for cosmetics and medical tests has contributed towards a debate based on conflicting interests. Despite the efforts in justifying the value of animals in conducting analyses, this study seeks to elaborate whether or not it is rational to use animals as test subjects in medical and cosmetics fields. The value of animal life is at the core of the emotional conflicts that arise when animals become experimental subjects in medical and cosmetics fields. The aim of this study is to determine if there are ethical differences in the use of animal testing in medicine versus cosmetics. The research, through review and content analysis of the existing literature, compares and provides the outcomes of using animals in medical and cosmetics tests by examining studies conducted in the UK.
By the next minute you are reading this, animals are killed in grief and pain in a US lab Lugo,A. Regardless of what is happening to animals, scientists are still using different animals such as rats, mice, rabbits, monkeys, and many others for the advancement of medical research and other experiments for human benefits. Scientific experiments are often unreliable, inapplicable, abusive, and, most importantly, immoral and inhumane methods of subjecting animals to suffer for the benefit of a human. Therefore, animals should not be used for different scientific researches and experiments. Scientific experiments are abusing animals in many aspects. Even though animals feel pain in the same way as humans do, they are subjected to painful and frequently deadly experiments.
PDF | Animal research or animal testing is done worldwide, where vertebrate animals, from zebrafish to non-human primates, millions in.
In the following viewpoint, the authors contend that the recent overhaul of the Toxic Substances Control Act will lead to a reduction in the number of animals subjected to experimentation. Revisions to the law, the authors maintain, will encourage companies to employ alternative methods for gathering data and work with other companies to reduce instances of duplicated experiments. The authors argue that advances in technology and a new willingness among companies to cooperate with one another have eliminated the need to test products on animals to ensure they are safe for humans to use.
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA. Home current Explore. Words: 1, Pages: 4.
Animal research and testing has played a part in almost every medical breakthrough of the last century. It has saved hundreds of millions of lives worldwide In animal testing, countless animals are experimented on and then killed after their use. Others are injured and will still live the remainder of their lives in captivity.
There are many pros and cons to the practice of animal testing. Unfortunately, neither seem to fully tip the scale to a side that pleases everyone — including the general public, government and scientists.
Posted by Uncategorized No Comments. Animal Cruelty Many of the animals that are used in labs for medical research are left traumatized, permanently disabled, or even dead. For example, scientists use animal testing to determine the effectiveness and side effects of potentially new medicines to help decide if these medicines are safe for people. The negative side of the animal testing debate includes arguments about cruelty. Forensics and Legal Implications The trial of O. Genetic testing has been used to verify or rule out relatedness of individual persons or populations. Critics of animal testing argue that testing on animals is unscientific, unreliable, and a violation of our morality.
Although it is desirable to replace scientific procedures with live animals by other methods that do not use them, the use of animals in scientific procedures should be restricted to those areas that benefit human, animal, and environmental health. The use of animals as experimental models of observation of biological phenomena has evolved with man, to this day. The use of animals for scientific or educational purposes should be considered only when there is no other alternative and it is governed by the principles of replacement, reduction, and refinement. The scientists should be sure that the information obtainable with the experiments is not yet available or that the protocol was designed taking into account animal protection considerations.
An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. Animals are used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications, check the safety of products destined for human use, and other biomedical , commercial, and health care uses. Research on living animals has been practiced since at least BC. Proponents of animal testing say that it has enabled the development of many life-saving treatments for both humans and animals, that there is no alternative method for researching a complete living organism, and that strict regulations prevent the mistreatment of animals in laboratories. Opponents of animal testing say that it is cruel and inhumane to experiment on animals, that alternative methods available to researchers can replace animal testing, and that animals are so different from human beings that research on animals often yields irrelevant results. Read more background….
И не похоже, что… - Что? - Бринкерхофф даже подпрыгнул. Мидж смотрела на цифры, не веря своим глазам. - Этот файл, тот, что загрузили вчера вечером… - Ну. - Шифр еще не вскрыт. Время ввода - двадцать три тридцать семь и восемь секунд, однако время завершения дешифровки не указано. - Мидж полистала страницы.
Вы промыли ей мозги. Вы рассказываете ей только то, что считаете нужным. Знает ли она, что именно вы собираетесь сделать с Цифровой крепостью.
Да нет, конечно! - Клушар почему-то улыбнулся.